Health Research, Vol. 6, Issue 1, Jun  2022, Pages 1-9; DOI:

Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robots in Stroke Rehabilitation: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Health Research, Vol. 6, Issue 1, Jun  2022, Pages 1-9.


Taiyu Han 1* , Yanbo Gao 2 , Yanping Han 3

1 School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

2 Inner Mongolia Hexi Space industrial Corporation, Inner Mongolia, China

3 Xiamen Best Information Technology Co., Ltd, Inner Mongolia, China

Received: 15 May 2022; Accepted: 31 May 2022; Published: 21 June 2022

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 40 | Download 24


Stroke is one of the causes of permanent disability in adults. The varying degrees of functional impairment in stroke patients not only reduces the quality of survival but also adds to the economic burden on families and society. Rehabilitation in hospital and at home is an important intervention for stroke patients to return to life. As the incidence of stroke and disability rates increase each year, the need for post-stroke rehabilitation is becoming increasingly significant. With the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, it has become increasingly difficult for stroke patients to travel to rehabilitation hospitals for regular rehabilitation. The use of lower limb rehabilitation robots to assist in the telerehabilitation of stroke patients is gaining importance in clinical applications. This paper reviews the clinical studies of the lower limb rehabilitation robot in improving motor and balance functions, gait and functional independence in stroke patients in three separate areas, with the aim of providing a reference for the development of scientific and efficient telerehabilitation services for stroke.


Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot, Stroke, Home-Based Telerehabilitation


© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


[1]  KrishnamurthiR.V.; IkedaT.; FeiginV.L. Global, Regional and Country Specific Burden of Ischaemic Stroke, Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Neuroepidemiology, 20202, 171-179.

[2] Johnson, C.O., et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurology, 2019, 18(5), 439-458.

[3] Wang, W.Z., et al. Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Stroke in China Results from a Nationwide Population-Based Survey of 480687 Adults. Circulation, 2017, 135(8)759.

[4] Huo, C.C., et al. Prospects for intelligent rehabilitation techniques to treat motor dysfunction. Neural Regeneration Research, 2021,16(2)264-269.

[5] Liu, X.F.; WangG.H.; MiaoF.R. The effect of early cognitive training and rehabilitation for patients with cognitive dysfunction in stroke. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2021, 30(3).

[6] Ren, X.P., et al. Efficacy of systematic voice training combined with swallowing function exercises for the prevention of swallowing dysfunction in stroke patients: a retrospective study. Annals of Translational Medicine, 2020, 10(4).

[7] Stinear, C.M., et al. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurology, 2020, 19(4)348-360.

[8] Wang, J.; Ma R.; Qu, Y. Progress of Telerehabilitation Techniques in Stroke Patients with Lower Extremity Dysfunction. Chinese journal of medical instrumentation, 2019, 43(3), 188-191.

[9] Stephenson, A. et al. Factors influencing the delivery of telerehabilitation for stroke: A systematic review. PloS one, 2022, 17(5).

[10] Laver, K.E. et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews, 2020(1).

[11] Caughlin, S., et al. Implementing Telerehabilitation After Stroke: Lessons Learned from Canadian Trials. Telemedicine And e-Health, 2020, 26(6)710-719.

[12] Dalla Gasperina, S., et al. Review on Patient-Cooperative Control Strategies for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeletons. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2021, 8.

[13] Duret, C.; Grosmaire, A.G.Krebs, H.I. Robot-Assisted Therapy in Upper Extremity Hemiparesis: Overview of an Evidence-Based Approach. Frontiers in Neurology, 2019, 10.

[14] Hussain, F.; GoeckeR.; Mohammadian, M. Exoskeleton robots for lower limb assistance: A review of materials, actuation, and manufacturing methods. Proceedings othe Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H-Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2021, 235(12)1375-1385.

[15] Kim, H.Y., et al. Robot-assisted gait training for balance and lower extremity function in patients with infratentorial stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019.

[16] Robinovitch, S.N., et al. Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: an observational study. Lancet, 2013,4147-54.

[17] Calabrò, R.S., et al. Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2018,15.

[18] Arienti, C., et al. Rehabilitation interventions for improving balance following stroke: An overview of systematic reviews. PloS one, 2019, 14(7).

[19] Yoshimoto, T., et al. Feasibility and efficacy of high-speed gait training with a voluntary driven exoskeleton robot for gait and balance dysfunction in patients with chronic stroke: nonrandomized pilot study with concurrent control. International journal of rehabilitation research, 2015.

[20] Kim, H., et al., Robot-assisted gait training for balance and lower extremity function in patients with infratentorial stroke: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2019, 16.

[21] Buesing, C.; Fisch G.; O'Donnell M. Effects of a wearable exoskeleton stride management assist system (SMA®) on spatiotemporal gait characteristics in individuals after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2015.

[22] Iosa, M., et al. Driving electromechanically assisted Gait Trainer for people with stroke. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2011, 48(2).

[23] Van Kammen, K., et al. Differences in muscle activity and temporal step parameters between Lokomat guided walking and treadmill walking in post-stroke hemiparetic patients and healthy walkers. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 201714(1).

[24] Jayaraman, A.; O'Brien, M.MadhavanS. Stride management assist exoskeleton vs functional gait training in stroke: A randomized trial. Neurology, 2018, 92(3).

[25] Androwis, G.J., et al. Electromyography Assessment During Gait in a Robotic Exoskeleton for Acute Stroke. Frontiers in Neurology, 2018, 9.

[26] ZhaoG.P.; Sharbafi, M., et al. Bio-Inspired Balance Control Assistance Can Reduce Metabolic Energy Consumption in Human Walking. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 2019, 27(9).

[27] Liu, W. A narrative review of gait training after stroke and a proposal for developing a novel gait training device that provides minimal assistance. Topics in stroke rehabilitation, 2018, 25(9).

[28] Kammen, K.; Boonstra A.M.; WoudeL.H., The combined effects of guidance force, bodyweight support and gait speed on muscle activity during able-bodied walking in the Lokomat. Clinical biomechanics, 2016, 3665-73.

[29] Santos B.D.; Oliveira C.B.; Santos A.D. A Comparative Study of Conventional Physiotherapy versus Robot-Assisted Gait Training Associated to Physiotherapy in Individuals with Ataxia after Stroke. Behavioural neurology, 2018.

[30] Taveggia, G., et al. Conflicting results of robot-assisted versus usual gait training during postacute rehabilitation of stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 2016, 39(1).