Art and Design, Vol. 4, Issue 4, Dec  2021, Pages 18-27; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31058/j.ad.2021.44004 https://doi.org/10.31058/j.ad.2021.44004

The Endeavour to Make Ourselves More Perfect - Ambivalences of Optimization

Art and Design, Vol. 4, Issue 4, Dec  2021, Pages 18-27.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31058/j.ad.2021.44004

Gerhard Schweppenhäuser 1*

1 Faculty of Design, University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Bavaria, Germany

Received: 2 August 2021; Accepted: 24 August 2021; Published: 13 September 2021

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 38 | Download 23

Abstract

Design is usually understood as a practice that aims to realize a possible optimum: the best (i.e. the most functional) thing form, the best (i.e. the most effective) problem solution, or the best (i.e. the maximally effective and consensual) process. It is easy to agree that design can be understood in this way. But does this also apply to the question of what an optimum is in the first place? And does it apply to the related question of whether the finalities of designing, modelling and shaping things, solutions and processes are to be seen in a technological optimum or in its socio-cultural dimensions? The paper analyzes the philosophical infrastructures in design and art with regard to their precarious state and draws our attention to the problem of transhumanism. It exposes the fragility of the relationship between nature and culture and the necessity of freedom and humanity in the double movement of “Mastery over the inner and outer Nature” and realize a possible optimum of design through humane redesign our living conditions.

Keywords

Design, Philosophy, Socio-Constructivism, Transhuman Design, Theology, Gender, Enlightenment, “Digital Takeover”, Mastery-over-the-inner-and-outer-Nature

Copyright

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

[1] For a discussion of the philosophical problematic of this dimension see Türcke 2021.

[2] As an example of the sometimes disastrous amalgamation of confusion and stimulation, consider Raymond Kurzweil's transhumanist manifesto, in which evolutionism, the cult of progress and innovation, as well as scientism, futurism and economism are blended for public effectKurzweil2014.

[3] Think of the unfortunate statement by the design philosopher Peter Sloterdijk (1999) on the subject of applied genetic research.

[4] Ausstellung-TranshumanAvailable online: https://www.hfg-gmuend.de/assets/downloads/Flyer-Ausstellung-Transhuman.pdf (accessed on 26 July 2021).

[5] Human-Centered Architecture: Bedeutung und HerausforderungenAvailable online: https://blog.dormakaba.com/de/human-centered-architecture-bedeutung-und-herausforderungen/ (accessed on 25 July 2021).

[6] Borgards, Roland. Texte zur Kulturtheorie und Kulturwissenschaft (Texts on cultural theory and cultural studies), Stuttgart, Germany: Philipp Reclam jun., 2010.

[7] Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1840). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte (Lectures on the Philosophy of History). In: Hegel, Werke in 20 Bd., vol. 12. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp, 1970.

[8] Hofer, S.; AndreasBBlick zurück nach vorn. Architektur und Stadtplanung in der DDR (Looking Back Forward. Architecture and Urban Planning in the GDR). Marburg, Germany (Schriftenreihe des Arbeitskreises Kunst in der DDR, vol. 3), 2017.

[9] Gottfried H. PERFEKTIBILITÄT: Eine Untersuchung zur Geschichte und Bedeutung dieses Begriffs in der deutschprachigen Literatur. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 198024(2), 221-257. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24359344 (accessed on 24 July 2021).

[10] Kant, Immanuel (1784). Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht (Idea for a General History with a Cosmopolitan Intention). In: Kant's Gesammelte Schriften, ed. by the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences, vol. VIII, Berlin and Leipzig, Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 1923; pp. 15-31.

[11] Kant, I. Über Pädagogik (On Pedagogy). In: Kant's Gesammelte Schriften, ed. by the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences, Berlin and Leipzig, Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1923, 8, 437-499.

[12] Koselleck, R. Fortschritt' und 'Niedergang' - Nachtrag zur Geschichte zweier Begriffe (Progress' and 'Decline' Addendum to the History of Two Terms). In: Koselleck, Begriffsgeschichten. Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache (Conceptual Histories. Studies on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Political and Social Language). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp, 2006, pp. 159-182, Germany.

[13] Kurzweil, Ray. Humanity 2.0. the singularity approaches. Berlin, Germany: Lola Books, 2014, Germany.

[14] Leibniz, G.W. Vernunftprinzipien der Natur und der Gnade (Reason Principles of Nature and Grace). In: ders, Vernunftprinzipien der Natur und der Gnade. Monadologie (Reason Principles of Nature and Grace. Monadology), ed. by Herbert Herring. Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner, 1982; pp. 2-25.

[15] Marx, K.; FriedrichE. Manifest der kommunistischen Partei (Manifesto of the Communist Party). In: Marx, Engels, Werke, ed. by the Institute for Marxism-Leninism at the Central Committee of the SED, Berlin, Germany: Dietz, 1983, 4, 459-493.

[16] Mendelssohn, MSendschreiben an den Herrn Magister Lessing in Leipzig (Letter to Magister Lessing in Leipzig). In: Mendelssohn, Ausgewählte Werke. Studienausgabe, vol. I, ed. by Christoph Schulte, Andreas Kennecke and Grażyna Jurewicz, Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 2009; pp. 129-152.

[17] Rousseau, J.J. Abhandlung über die Frage: Hat der Wiederaufstieg der Wissenschaften und Künste zur Läuterung der Sitten beigetragen? (Treatise on the Question: Has the Revival of the Sciences and Arts Contributed to the Purification of Morals?) In: Rousseau, Schriften zur Kulturkritik, translated and edited by Kurt Weigand. Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner, 1983; pp. 3-59.

[18] Rousseau, J.J. Über den Ursprung der Ungleichheit unter den Menschen (On the Origin of Inequality among Men). In: Rousseau, Schriften zur Kulturkritik, translated and edited by Kurt Weigand. Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner, 1983; pp. 63-269.

[19] Sloterdijk, P. Regeln für den Menschenpark. Ein Antwortschreiben zu Heideggers Brief über den Humanismus (Rules for the Human Park. A Reply to Heidegger's Letter on Humanism), Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2017, Germany, ISBN 978-3518065822.

[20] Städtler, MAspekte eines kritischen Geschichtsdenkens (Aspects of critical thinking about history). In: Städtler (ed.), Kontingenz und Begriff. Über das Denken von Geschichte und die Geschichtlichkeit des Denkens (Contingency and Concept. On thinking history and the historicity of thinking). Springe: zu Klampen, Germany, 2019; pp. 9-34.

[21] Türcke, CNatur und Gender. Kritik eines Machbarkeitswahns (Nature and Gender. Critique of a mania for feasibility). Munich: C. H. Beck, Germany2021.

[22] Vogl, J. Kapital und Ressentiment. Eine kurze Theorie der Gegenwart (Capital and Ressentiment. A brief Theory of the Present). Munich, Germany: C. H. Beck2021.

Related Articles