Health Research, Vol. 3, Issue 2, Jun  2019, Pages 13-20; DOI: 10.31058/j.hr.2019.31012 10.31058/j.hr.2019.31012

Inguinal Hernia: Experience in a Community General Hospital

, Vol. 3, Issue 2, Jun  2019, Pages 13-20.

DOI: 10.31058/j.hr.2019.31012

Saadeldin Ahmed Idris 1,3* , Abdul Ghani Qureshi 2,3

1 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alzaeim Alazhari Uninersity, KRT, Sudan

2 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Baqai Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan

3 Department of Surgery, Almikhwah General Hospital, Al Makhwah, Saudi Arabia

Received: 2 December 2019; Accepted: 5 December 2019; Published: 9 December 2019

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 214 | Download 128

Abstract

Groin hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed general surgical operations. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of the current practice of an open inguinal hernia mesh repair in a community general hospital. A total of 23 patients underwent open tension-free inguinal hernia mesh repair (January 2018 to December 2018). Their mean age was 43±21.5 years (Range, 16 to 85 years). Mean duration of symptoms was 8.08±4.3 weeks (range, 4 to 28 weeks). It was in the right side in 56.5% and indirect in 78.3%. Mean hospital stay was 1.1±0.3 days, this was not affected by age and the duration of hernia as p value was 0.11 and 0.6 respectively. The analgesics use was ranging between 3 to 5 days (mean 3.3±0.7 days). Two patients (8.7%) has experienced pain that disappeared in less than month, and only 1 patient (4.3%) experienced pain that continued for more than month. Presence of chronic pain was not affected by age and the duration of the hernia as p value was 0.38 and 0.98 respectively. Good satisfaction was achieved in 91.3% and it was not affected by age and the duration of hernia as p value was 0.4 and 0.85 respectively. In conclusion, low recurrence rates, and a low percentage of persistent pain suggest that open repair with standardized mesh for hernia repair remains a good option for group of patients seeking health in a community hospital.

Keywords

Inguinal Hernia (IH), Open Mesh Repair, Chronic Pain (CP), Outcome, Recurrence, Patient’s Satisfaction

Copyright

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

[1] Shirah, B.H.; Shirah, H.A. Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty for inguinal hernias: simplicity is the ultimate sophistication. Int Surg J., 2016, 3(1), 230-236.

[2] Benso, M.G.S; Lages, S.R; Timm do, C.F.P; Rangel, G.J.W; Salomão, P.D.N. Results of the simultaneous bilateral inguinal hernia repair by the Lichtenstein technique. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2013, 40(5), 370-373.

[3] Njhus, L.M; Coclon, R.E; Judge, C.; Rhoads, J.E. Hernia J.B. Lippincot, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 3rd edition, 1989. Available online: https://academia.edu (accessed on 30 June 2019).

[4] Idris, S.A.; Elzaki, E.K.; Qurashi, A.; Shalayel, M.H.F.; Idris, T.A.; Alegail, I. Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. SMM. 2010, 5(1), 19-23.

[5] Aikoye, A.; Harilingam, M.; Khushal, A. The Impact of High Surgical Volume on Outcomes From Laparoscopic (Totally Extra Peritoneal) Inguinal Hernia Repair. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015, 9(6), PC15-6.

[6] Kassab, P.; Franciulli, E.F.; Wroclawski, C.K.; Ilias, E.J.; Castro, O.A.P.; Malheiros, C.A. Meshless treatment of open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study. Einstein. 2013, 11(2), 186-9, DOI: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000200009.

[7] Darokar, A.; Bele, K.; Mulmule, R.; Qazi, R. Study of open inguinal hernia repair by mosquito net mesh versus polypropylene mesh. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016, 4(1), 126-130.

[8] Chao, T.E.; Mandigo, M.; Opoku-Anane, J.; Maine, R. Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc. 2016, 30, 1-10.

[9] Singh, S.; Bal, K.S.; Kaur, V.; Dabar, S.S. Hernia Repair: Challenges and Innovations; Our Initial Experience with Dynamic Implants. JIMSA. 2014, 27(1), 37-39.

[10] Cheong, K.X.; Lo, H.Y.; Neo, J.X.; Appasamy, V.; Chiu, M.T. Inguinal hernia repair: are the results from a general hospital comparable to those from dedicated hernia centres? Singapore Med J. 2014, 55(4), 191-7.

[11] Chaitanya, D.K.; Srihari, D. Inguinal hernia repair using standard mesh - Our experience. IAIM. 2016, 3(7), 310-313.

[12] Yamamoto, S.; Maeda, T.; Uchida, Y.; Yabe, S.I.; Nakano, M.; Sakano, S.; Yamamoto, M. Open Tension-Free Mesh Repair for Adult Inguinal Hernia: Eight Years of Experience in a Community Hospital. Asian J Surg. 2002, 25(2), 121-5.

[13] Dasari, B.; Grant, L.; Irwin, T. Immediate and long-term outcomes of Lichtenstein and Kugel patch operations for inguinal hernia repair. Ulster Med J. 2009, 78(2), 115-8.

[14] Ahmad, A.; Hayat, K.; Alam, M.; Rasool, I. Long Term Outcome of Inguinal Hernia Repair by Lichtenstein Technique. PJMHS. 2016, 10(3), 796-799.

[15] Bay-Nielsen, M.; Nordin, P.; Nilsson, E. et al. Operative findings in recurrent hernia after a Lichtenstein procedure. Am I Surg. 2001, 182(2), 134-6.

[16] Palermo, M.; Acquafresca, P.A.; Bruno, M.; Tarsitano, F. Hernioplasty with and without mesh: analysis of the immediate complications in a randomized controlled clinical trial. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015, 28(3), 157-160.

[17] Fricano, S.; Fiorentino, E.; Cipolla, C.; Matranga, D.; Bottino, A.; Mastrosimone, A.; Bonanno, E.; Latteri, M.A. A Minor Modification of Lichtenstein Repair of Primary Inguinal Hernia: Post-operative Discomfort Evaluation. The American Surgeon, 2010, 76(7), 764-769.

[18] Brygel, M.; Bonato, L.J.; Farah, S.S. Chronic Pain Review Following Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: A Personal Series. Surgical Science, 2012, 3, 430-435.

[19] Lau, H.; Lee, F. An audit of the early outcomes of ambulatory inguinal hernia repair at a surgical day-care centre. HKMJ. 2000, 6, 218-20.

[20] Nilsson, E.; Kald, A.; Anderberg, B.; Bragmark, M.; Fordell, R.; Haapaniemi, S.; Heuman, R.; Lindhagen, J.; Stubberöd, A.; Wickbom, J. Hernia surgery in a defined population: a prospective three-year audit. Eur J Surg. 1997, 163, 823-9.

[21] Hulme-Moir, M.; Kyle, S. A prospective audit of Lichtenstein’s tension-free herniorrhaphy in Taranaki, New Zealand. Aust NZ J Surg. 1998, 68, 801-3.

[22] Brooks, D.C. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy. Arch Surg. 1994, 129, 361-6.

[23] Holmes, J.; Readman, R. A study of wound infections following inguinal hernia repair. J Hosp Infect. 1994, 28, 153-6.

[24] Lau, H.; Poon, J.; Lee, F. Patient satisfaction after ambulatory inguinal hernia repair in Hong Kong. Ambulatory Surgery, 2000, 8, 115-118.

[25] Baskerville, P.A.; Jarrett, P.E. Day case inguinal hernia repair under local anaesthetic. Ann R CollSurg Engl. 1983, 65, 224-5.

[26] Ghosh, S.; Sallam, S. Patient satisfaction and postoperative demands on hospital and community services after day surgery. Br J Surg. 1994, 81, 1635–8.