Environment, Vol. 3, Issue 3, Dec  2019, Pages 1-7; DOI: 10.31058/j.envi.2019.33001 10.31058/j.envi.2019.33001

The Ecology of Toads (Bufo Regularis) in Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

, Vol. 3, Issue 3, Dec  2019, Pages 1-7.

DOI: 10.31058/j.envi.2019.33001

Mogbo Tochukwu Chinedu 1* , Samuelson Chidolu Shalom 2

1 Bioconservation Unit, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Bioscience, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awkan, Nigeria

Received: 1 November 2019; Accepted: 20 November 2019; Published: 30 November 2019

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 34 | Download 20


In a 4 weeks study, the ecology of toads in Nnamdi Azikiwe University was studied. Two sites/habitats (swampy water body at the girl’s hostel and the stream behind faculty of management sciences) were sampled twice weekly and the toads were collected by active search at night for relative toad density, and physiochemical properties of the water bodies. A total of eighty six (86) toads were collected; forty (48) from habitat A and thirty eight (38) from habitat B. Physiochemical parameters investigated include pH, conductivity, acidity, alkalinity, biological oxygen demand, temperature, turbidity. Numerically the population of habitat A was greater than that of habitat B, but statistical analysis using t-test showed no statistical significance between the two populations. The analysis of the water habitats in comparison with the regulatory limit or standard of the world health organization (WHO) and Nigeria Industrial standard (NIS) showed that the pH values of the both habitats were below the standard or regulatory limit. The temperature values were ambient and supportive of good surface water quality, Total dissolved solids (TDS), alkalinity, turbidity and dissolved oxygen (DO) was within acceptable limit of WHO while biological oxygen demand (BOD) exceeded the limit of WHO.


Toad, Bufo Regularis, Ecology, Physico-Chemical Parameters


© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


[1]Alabaster, J.S. and Lioyd, R. Water quality criteria for freshwater fish. European inland fisheries advisory commission report (FAO). Buttersworth, London-boston, 1980; pp. 297

[2]Alford, R.A., Mcdiarmid R.W. and Altig R.(eds). Ecology: resource use, competition and predation in tadpoles. The biology of anuran larvae. the university of Chicago press, Chicago Illinois U.S.A, 1999; pp. 189-214

[3]Barrett, K.; Guyer, C.; Idatson, D. Water from urban streams slows growth and speeds metamorphosis in fowler’s toads (bufo fowleri) larvae. Journal of Herpetology, 2010, 44, 297-300

[4]Bishop, C.A.; Gendron, A.D. Reptiles and amphibians: Shy and sensitive vertebrates of the Great Lakes Basin and St. Lawrence River. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1998, 53, 225-244.

[5]Blaustein, A.R.; Bancroft, B.A.; Waggener, A.A.; Romansic, J.M. Influence of UV-B radiation on growth, prevalence of deformities, and susceptibility to predation in cascades frog (Rena cascadae) larvae. Hydrobiology, 2009, 624(1), 219-233.

[6]Boone, M.D.; Bridges, C.M. Effects of carbaryl on green frog (Rana clamitans) tadpoles; timong versus exposures. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2003, 22, 2695-2702.

[7]Burger, J.; Snodgrass, J. Heavy metals in bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) tadpoles: effects of depuration before analysis. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1998, 17, 2203-2209.

[8]Chapman, D.(ed) Chapman & Hall on behalf of UNESCO, WHO (and) UNEP. Water quality assessments; a guide to the use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring London. 1992; pp. 876

[9]Corn, S.P. Climate change and amphibians. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 2005, 28, 57-59.

[10]Cummins, C.P. UV-B radiation, climate change and frogs-the importance of phenology. Annals Zoologic Fennici, 2003, 40, 61-67.

[11]Felters, G.M.; Mcconnell L.L.; Pratt, D.; Datta, S. Pesticides in mountain yellow legged frogs (Rana muscosa) from the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California.USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2004, 23, 2170-2177.

[12]Gendron, A.D.; Marcogliese, D.J.; Barbeau, S.; Christin, M.S.; Brousseau, P.; Ruby, S.; Cyr, D.; Fournier, M. Expose of leopard frogs to a pesticide mixture affects life history characteristics of the lungworm Rhabdies ranae. Oecologia. 2006, 135, 469-476.

[13]Henry, P.F.P.; In:sparling, D.W.; Linder, G.; Bishop, C.A., (eds). Aspects of amphibian anatomy and physiology. Pensacola FL: society of environmental toxicology and chemistry (SETAC), 2000; pp. 71-111.

[14]Murphy, J.E., Phillips, C.A., In:sparling, D.W., Linder, G., Bishop, C.A(eds) and Beasley, V.R. Aspects of amphibian ecology. Ecotoxicology of amphibian and reptiles. Pensacola, FL: Society of environmental toxicology and chemistry (SETAC), 2000; pp. 141-179

[15]NIS (Nigeria industrial standard). Nigerian standard for drinking water quality. NIS 554: 2007, ICS 13. 060-20. Approved by the standard organization of Nigerian (SON) govering council, 2007; pp.14-18

[16]Sower, S.A.; Reed, K.L.; Babbitt, K.J. Limb malformations and abnormal sex hormone concentrates in frogs. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000, 108, 1085-1090.

[17]Stuart, S.M.; Chanson, J.S.; Cox, N.A. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science, 2004, 306(5702), 1783-1786.

[18]WHO (world health organization). Guidelines for drinking water quality 4th Edn.; NLM classification: WA 675, World health organization, geneva, Switzerland. 2011; pp. 307-433, ISBN: 9789241548151.

Related Articles