Urban Design, Vol. 1, Issue 2, Sep  2018, Pages 39-47; DOI: 10.31058/j.ud.2018.12004 10.31058/j.ud.2018.12004

From Portal to Urban Play: Contemporary China and Brazil

, Vol. 1, Issue 2, Sep  2018, Pages 39-47.

DOI: 10.31058/j.ud.2018.12004

Elena Kilina 1*

1 Social Science and Philosophy Faculty (IFCH), Unicamp, Campinas, Brazil; School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Received: 8 October 2018; Accepted: 10 November 2018; Published: 19 November 2018

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 389 | Download 233

Abstract

This research builds on the conversation about the relationship between space and people, with the focus on the anthropology of space and the introduction of state of play (engagement) which in the framework of BRICS, as described in the case studies of Brazil and China. The modern colonial geographies’ viewpoint may urge us to rethink these notions with the emergence of alternative functions of some spaces, and the re-imagination of urban space by what it may be named global modernity. At the local, regional, national and global context, space is not an empty element, but is complicated mixture of social and public relations and meanings. The intend contrast between the Sao Paulo site - Parque Minhocão and Shanghai space - Redtown was to identify some key factors regarding why one space “works” for play and one does not. Redtown can be defined as the still birth of an incubator, and as such provides a means for investigating the reasons as to why it does not work as a planned arts hub, including the reasons it never worked as a site of play. The Parque Minhocão in contrast is an urban phenomenon that can be considered in the context of the urban space of São Paulo, and as a spontaneous emergence of urban construction with the planned interactions between residents in the surrounding areas, visitors and place.

Keywords

Urban Space, Public Place, Interaction, Play, Visual Anthropology, Brazil-China

Copyright

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

[1] Beals, Ralph L.; Hoijer, H. An Introduction to Anthropology. Macmillan Company: New York, 1965.
[2] Bird, J. et al. (eds), Mapping the Futures. Local cultures, global change. Routledge: London, 1993.
[3] Bruno, A-P. Smart Cities Movements in BRICS, ed. Urban Development in Brazil and The Challenge of Building Smart Cities, 2017, 23-34.
[4] Campos Filho, C.M. Brazilian Cities: Control or Chaos, Editora Nobel: Brazil, 1992.
[5] Collier, M., et al.: Visual Anthropology. Photography as a Research Method. University of Mexico., 1986.
[6] Christopher, A. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press: USA, 1977.
[7] Foucault, M. (1980b) ‘Questions on Geography: Interviewers: The Editors of the Journal Hérodote.’ In C. Gordon (Ed.) Michel Foucault: Power/Knowledge:
Foucault, M. (1980b) ‘Questions on Geography: Interviewers: The Editors of the Journal Hérodote.’ In C. Gordon (Ed.) Michel Foucault: Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Harvester Press: Brighton, UK: 63-77.
[8] Fox, Richard G, Urban Anthropology: Cities in their Cultural Settings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall., 1977.
[9] Glaser, B. The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis. Social Problems, 1965, 12(4), 436-445.
[10] Goffman, E. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Allen Lane. The Penguin Press: 1972.
[11] Gomide, á. Urban Transportation and Social Inclusion: Elements for Public Policy, IPEA, 2003.
[12] Gossmann, C. Finding Relief in the Worlds Most Congested City: A Sunday Afternoon on São Paulos Minhocão, 2012. Available online: http://www.citylab.com/design/2012/05/finding-relief-worlds-most-congested-city-sunday-afternoon-minhocao/2040/ (accessed on 8 October 2018).
[13] Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens, a study of the play-element in culture. Beacon Press: Boston, 1955.
[14] Jacobs, J. The death and life of great American cities. Random House: New York, 1993
[15] Ing, D. Open Innovation Learning: Theory-building on open sourcing while private sourcing. Coevolving Innovations Inc, Glasstree: Toronto, 2017.
[16] Lefebvre H., Writing on Cities. Blackwell Publishers: Cambridge-Oxford, 1996.
[17] Liu, K. Globalization and Cultural Trends in China. University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, 2006, 86-94.
[18] Low, M.S, On the plaza: the politics of public place and culture. University of Texas Press: Austin. 2003.
[19] Nousala, S. Emerging `living′ Communities Scalability of Knowledge Transfer in Complex Systems, 16th WMSCI multi-conference, CENT symposium (collaborative enterprise). 2012.
[20] Ortiz, F. Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, 1955.
[21] Redtown: Ten years. Tongji University Press: Shanghai, 2015, 225.
[22] Simmel, G. The metropolis and mental life. In The sociology of Simmel, ed. K. H. Wolff, Free Press: Glencoe, IL, 1950, 409-426.
[23] Yu, Hai. The Rise of the Third Sector. Shanghai. Fudan University Press: Shanghai, 1998.
[24] Yu, K.; Padua, M.G. Chinas Cosmetic Cities: Urban Fever and Superficiality. Landscape Research, 2007, 32(2), 255-272.

Related Articles