Education Journal, Vol. 2, Issue 2, Jun  2019, Pages 21-28; DOI: 10.31058/ 10.31058/

Superspeech and Its Rhetorical Figures

Education Journal, Vol. 2, Issue 2, Jun  2019, Pages 21-28.

DOI: 10.31058/

Lepota Lazar Cosmo 1*

1 Independent Scholar, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, USA

Received: 29 July 2018; Accepted: 23 July 2019; Published: 15 August 2019

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 1968 | Download 1181


Humour is the remnant of perfect language, the residuum of pristine speech. Superspeech as wordiness, long-windedness, grandiloquence, garrulousness, chattiness, glibness, is formal expression of talkativeness, purposeful and stylish speech within limited budget of time and colloquial words. Speech is imposed but with intent purpose and metalingistical discourse, positioned within linear budget and its transcending function. Its rational limitations are rather projected to transcendental style of rhetoric, or funds of noncolloquial word and expressions. Superspeech is metalingual phenomenon whereas its metalinguistic nature produces useful lingual values. In concept of lingual vocation, superspeech is intentional rhetoric capability, a great lingual practice of genuine ability to use words, phrases or voices.


Rhetorical Figures, Superspeech, Language and Education, Philosophy of Language


© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


[1] Attardo, S. Linguistic theories of humor (Vol. 1). Walter de Gruyter. 1994; ISBN 9783110142556.

[2] Antony, L. Meta-linguistics: Methodology and ontology in Devitt’s Ignorance of language. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2008, 86(4), 643-656, DOI: 10.1080/00048400802340683.

[3] Coomaraswamy, A. K. A Figure of Speech, or a Figure of Thought. Journal of Philosophy, 1944, 41, 134-135

[4] Devitt, M. Ignorance of Language. 2006; ISBN 9780199250967

[5] Bateson, G. The position of humor in human communication. In Cybernetics Ninth Conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, 1-47; 1953; ISBN 9783037345986

[6] Gombert, J. E. Metacognition, metalanguage and metapragmatics. International Journal of psychology, 1993, 28(5), 571-580, DOI: 10.1080/00207599308246942.

[7] Fahnestock, J. Rhetorical stylistics. Language and Literature, 2005, 14(3), 215-230, DOI: 10.1177/0963947005054478.

[8] Hopper, R. Speech errors and the poetics of conversation. Text and Performance Quarterly, 1992, 12(2), 113-124, DOI: 10.1080/10462939209359641.

[9] Klujeff, M. Rhetorical Figures and Style as Argumentation. Studies in Rhetoric: Rhetorica Scandinavica, 2005, 1997. 302-22; ISBN 9789186093099.

[10] Lyotard, J-F. The Sublime and the Avant Garde 1. Paragraph, 1985. 6(1), 1-18.

[11] McComiskey, B. Gorgias and the new sophistic rhetoric. SIU Press. 2002; ISBN: 9780809390137.

[12] Miller, A. Rhetoric, paideia and the old idea of a liberal education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2007. 41(2), 183-206.

[13] Morreall, J. A new theory of laughter. Philosophical Studies, 1982, 42(2), 243-254, DOI: 10.1007/BF00374037.

[14] Newmeyer, F. J. Has there been a’Chomskyan Revolution’in Linguistics. Language, 1986, 1-18, DOI: 10.2307/415597.

[15] Paulos, J. The Logic of Humour and the Humour in Logic. In It’s a Funny Thing, Humour: Proceedings of The International Conference on Humour and Laughter 1976 (p. 113). Elsevier. 2013; ISBN 978-0-08-021376-7

[16] Raskin, V. Semantic mechanisms of humor (Vol. 24). Springer Science & Business Media. 1985; ISBN 9789027718211

[17] Raskin, V. (Ed.). The primer of humor research (Vol. 8). Walter de Gruyter. 2008. ISBN 978-3-11-018616-1

[18] Segalowitz, N. On the evolving connections between psychology and linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2001, 21, 3-22, DOI: 10.1017/S0267190501000010.

[19] Simons, P. M. A semantics for ontology. Dialectica, 1985, 39(3), 193-216.

[20] Simons, P. On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing. 2003.

[21] Utsumi, A. A cognitive approach to poetic effects of rhetorical figures: toward a unified theory of cognitive rhetoric. In Proceedings of the 19th Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (IAEA2006), 2006, 413-417.

Related Articles